We believe that recognition should mean something. That's why our Coach Honors designations are grounded in independent research and genuine peer nominations — never in who pays.
CoachHonors Editorial Board
Nomination & Identification
Candidates enter review two ways: open nominations from clients, peers, or coaches themselves, and coaches our editors identify through their own research. Neither path carries an advantage — both land in the same review queue.
Credential Review
Editors review each candidate's stated certifications and training — ICF credentials such as ACC, PCC, and MCC, and specialty designations like CPCC — checking them against issuing organizations where verification is available.
Standing & Public Record
We look at the candidate's professional history and public record: their body of work, their standing among peers and clients, and anything — misrepresented credentials, ethical violations, patterns of complaints — that would disqualify them.
Editorial Selection
The editorial team makes the final decision. No commercial consideration enters the room: paid products are offered only after selection, and buying or declining them cannot add, keep, or remove a name from the list.
Notification & Publication
Selected coaches are notified and may accept at no cost. Acceptance publishes a recognition listing with the coach's name, city, and state on the honoree list. Optional recognition packages, including a full profile, a badge license, and an award, are available to those who want them: clearly priced, entirely optional, and irrelevant to the selection already made.
Six Dimensions of Excellence
The CoachHonors evaluation process is unlike anything I've encountered. The team reviewed peer nominations, client outcomes, and professional credentials — not just a self-reported bio. That rigor made the recognition genuinely meaningful.
Maria Elena Armijo, MCC — Executive Coach · 2025 Top Coach In America